Wikipedia:Triple Crown/Nominations

Triple Crown Nominations

Instructions

Copy the nomination layout example into a third-level subsection at the bottom of the page.
Specify the award type (e.g. "Standard Triple Crown") and list an equal number of entries for DYK, GA and FC. (For instance, you could provide 3 DYKs, 3 GAs and 3 FCs for the Imperial Triple Crown, but not 100 DYKs, 12 GAs and 8 FCs.)
For DYKs, no evidence is required if the entries are listed by this tool. Otherwise, please give a diff of DYK credits e.g. Special:Diff/1082114165.
For good articles, featured articles and featured lists, you must have substantially written, referenced or overhauled the article. An authorship link showing at least 25% or the highest percentage among all authors is evidence of this.
For other featured content, provide links that evidence major authorship.
For upgrades from an existing award, specify the old and new upgrade levels and provide all articles (including those from the existing award).

Example nomination

Award type e.g. Imperial Triple Crown Jewels

List

User	DYK	GA	FC
User:Example	Apple, Banana, Fig (give credits only if the articles are not listed by this tool, e.g. DYK credit example)	Chocolate, Durian, Eggplant (give authorship links after all articles are listed: 1, 2, 3)	Durian, Eggplant, Fig (1, 2, 3)

Nominations that do not provide authorship evidence, or ignore other instructions, will be declined.

Current nominations

Standard Triple Crown

User	DYK	GA	FC
User:Penny Richards	QPQTool listing for Penny Richards	Marilyn Saviola ([1])	Daisy Bacon ([2]) (7.2%, but I started the page)

Hi Penny Richards. I certainly commend you for starting Daisy Bacon, and your incredible contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red as well by the looks of things. However, at least historically, starting the page itself has been neither here nor there for the purpose of being a major contributor to any of the three types of articles needed for the Triple Crown, so unfortunately I don't think this qualifies. Pinging Bilorv for a second opinion. Damien Linnane (talk) 02:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah well, thanks for checking. I knew it was a stretch. Penny Richards (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]