Wikipedia:WikiProject Climate change/Recommended sources
| Main | Participants | Popular articles | Recommended sources | Style guide | Get started with easy edits | Talk |
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
As with all topic areas on WIkipedia, climate articles should be based on reliable secondary sources. When writing an article, choosing high-quality sources is critical to ensure:
- That each statement is verifiable and not original research
- That the article is neutral and balanced in coverage
- That the article gives an encyclopedic and global overview of the topic rather than a collection of indiscriminate information
Articles related to climate often bring in knowledge from multiple disciplines including various sciences, economics, business, and geography. The general minimum standard for quality of sourcing is described in Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. When discussing science, it is recommended to use more rigorous sources as described in Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science). Note that any statements about human health must meet a high standard for sourcing known as MEDRS.
Text from publications with Wikipedia-compatible licensing can be copied into Wikipedia with attribution in the edit summary and use of an attribution template. See Wikipedia:Adding open license text to Wikipedia.
IPCC and other United Nations bodies
[edit]IPCC reports are highly reliable as they capture international scientific consensus. We have a useful cheat sheet on citations for IPCC reports.
These reports are some of the best available about solutions to limit climate change, not just about the causes and effects of warming. The most recent is the Sixth Assessment Report (2021-2023). The more of this report that we can get into Wikipedia, the better. While IPCC reports are the gold standard for quality sourcing, they are written in an extremely dense and academic style which makes them difficult to read. They often use terminology that Wikipedia's readers would probably not understand.
Other United Nations bodies such as the United Nations Environment Programme are also top-quality sources on climate change. Unlike the IPCC, other UN bodies may make policy recommendations. They also tend to be easier to read and summarize.
- All key UN climate reports
- The annual Emissions Gap report has well-organized information on mitigation
Other organizations and governments
[edit]- The International Energy Agency has many useful reports. Official website. However, as described in International_Energy_Agency#Criticism, the Agency has a history of underpredicting renewable energy uptake. Published under a Wikipedia-compatible license (CC-BY 4.0)
- The International Renewable Energy Agency similarly has a large collection of reports. May have different bias from IEA.
- Royal Society reports are high-quality and often published under a Wikipedia-compatible Creative Commons license
- World Resources Institute, published under a Wikipedia-compatible license (CC-BY 4.0)
- The World Bank publishes global data on climate, including country profiles. Other World Bank web pages and reports also cover energy access issues.
- The U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine publishes reports that capture national-level scientific consensus on certain issues. National Academies Press Climate Change Collection
Topic overviews from reputable websites
[edit]- Our World in Data has excellent articles, maps, and graphs, released under a Wikipedia-compatible license (CC-BY 4.0). Official website. Many of these graphs and maps have already been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, so it's easy to take them from there and insert them into Wikipedia articles.
- Carbon Brief has excellent analyses and IPCC report summaries. (Official website)
- There are a large number of (paywalled) encyclopedias published, including Oxford Research Encyclopedias - Climate science (which has a browsable table of contents, perhaps good for finding new articles to work on.)
- For those looking to learn more on climate actions topics, such as transportation-related actions, food-, consumption-, etc,, before/during editing of an article, there is an evolving/growing list of useful secondary and tertiary articles being maintained by the science-based group Climate Steps. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d3nGAncF973_pnmDknke8nGL_fMNxuoXmeMRYiH3Abk/edit?usp=sharing., created thru funds by the Wikimedia Foundation.
Books
[edit]University-level textbooks and books published by academic publishers such as university presses are generally excellent sources. They often explain basic concepts that IPCC reports do not. Books from non-academic publishers are of more variable quality.
Books from Cambridge University Press are available for free to qualified editors at the Wikipedia Library. These books include Introduction to Modern Climate Change (2021) by Andrew E. Dressler. If you do not qualify to borrow from the Wikipedia Library, you can request a book chapter at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request.
Research tip for US libraries in particular: search for 'libguides' and 'climate change' to find library guides on the topic.
Scholarly journals and news reports
[edit]Articles in scholarly journals can be either primary or secondary. Secondary articles are known as reviews and include systematic reviews and literature reviews. When doing a Google Scholar search, you can filter search results to show review articles only.
Papers that report on research conducted by the authors of the paper are primary sources and should be used judiciously, if at all. Primary research papers present new findings, but they do not indicate the degree to which those findings have been accepted by the scientific community. News reports that cover the announcements of new research findings have this issue as well. We rely on secondary and tertiary sources to put new research findings into perspective.
In addition to reporting on new primary research, news outlets often report about individual projects ("Company X is deploying the largest solar farm in Australia to date!") and novel technologies ("Company X is exploring how to solve climate change through CO2-capturing balloons/ toilets for cows / space-based solar power!"). Wikipedia articles that are based on news reports often resemble a disjointed science news feed and give undue weight to highly specific projects and ideas. To avoid this phenomenon, use sources that cover the topic of the article at a more general level.
Country-specific sources
[edit]- U.S. National Climate Assessment, which is updated regularly
- Regional & Country Risk Profiles and GHG Emissions Fact Sheets from USAID. Wikipedia-compatible licensing (public domain).
- World Bank Environmental Analysis for various countries
- IEA Countries and Regions
- UNDP Adaptation reports
Citing long reports
[edit]In the climate change topic area, editors make frequent use of reports.
- Unfortunately, the Visual Editor does not have a handy form for reports. Instead, you can insert a Cite report template.
- When citing reports, each citation must specify a page number or range unless the report is very short. Typically the easiest way to do this is to insert a citation to the report and then add Template:Rp with the page number or range.