User talk:Sportsgamaniacre

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Sportsgamaniacre! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bucks–Bulls rivalry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|current_streak=[Chicago Bulls|CHI]]: W4 (2014–)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miami Heat alternate logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miami Heat alternate logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miami Heat second alternate logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miami Heat second alternate logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on rivalries

I undid your edit at National Basketball Association rivalries for the NY–LA rivalry because it was unsourced. Rivalries need independent reliable sources that refer to a long-term rivalry, not routine coverage about a single game that uses the term loosely. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 23:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The Comcast Network 2015 logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Comcast Network 2015 logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2009–10 Golden State Warriors season

added links pointing to Jason Thompson, Reggie Williams, David Lee, Mike Miller, David West, Nick Young, Chris Hunter and Rudy Fernandez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sportsgamaniacre. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:KnicksWordmark.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KnicksWordmark.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

A gentle reminder that the standard offer was granted on the condition, among others, that you would stop making unsourced edits. Your latest edits to the Los Angeles Lakers is a clear violation. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 06:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued unsourced edits in violation of previous acceptance of standard offer, as you did at Chicago Bulls. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry I did unsourced editing. I will take responsibilities for the actions I have done and correct the wrong-doing. Sportsgamaniacre (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were explicitly reminded of the "unsourced edits" problem by Bagumba on March 4. You continued making unsourced edits, for example here. There has acctually quite a lapse between those edits and your blocks; you have not used that time to add sources. I don't see how you could have been unaware of what you did. Huon (talk) 22:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood the violation of the standard offer I committed. I know that it was wrong for me to commit such an act. I will not do it again, I promise. Sportsgamaniacre (talk) 21:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've had your second chance and you blew it. PhilKnight (talk) 23:11, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood the violation of the previous standard offer that got me blocked. I never should have done disruptive editing as vandalism. I have read the blocking policy. I have shown that I will never violate the previous standard offer again. I will put my violations behind me and learn from the mistakes I made to Wikipedia. Sportsgamaniacre (talk) 22:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see how you can claim "I hav eshown that I will never violate the previous standard offer again." In fact, you've shown the opposite. You've shown by your actions that you will indeed violate any terms imposed upon you. Regardless, you are not eligible for the WP:SO at this time. Please come back in six months. Yamla (talk) 00:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I said I will never violate the terms again. You did not listen. I said I was sorry about what I did. Sportsgamaniacre (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. Please see WP:UTRS to submit an appeal. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the next reviewing admin, please consider revoking talk page access. WP:IDHT. --Yamla (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18193 was submitted on May 04, 2017 00:02:14. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:DevilsWordmark.gif

Thank you for uploading File:DevilsWordmark.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DevilsWordmark.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DevilsWordmark.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have understood that violating the previous acceptance from WP:SO is totally wrong. I am very sorry what I did. I did not mean to do it. I have made a mistake, okay? I didn't know I was given the warning. I promise that I will never disobey the warning you gave me. Sportsgamaniacre (talk) 20:37, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You may want to review this article, the concept seems to be giving you trouble. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were told to come back in six months. I see you decided not to follow those instructions. As such, I'm once again revoking talk page access. Another admit will be along to review your unblock request. If declined, that leaves you with WP:UTRS and I very, very strongly advise you wait at least six months before attempting that. --Yamla (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19130 was submitted on Sep 01, 2017 07:08:35. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19410 was submitted on Oct 04, 2017 05:48:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:48, 4 October 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20714 was submitted on Feb 23, 2018 00:29:26. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20809 was submitted on Mar 07, 2018 23:18:51. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sportsgamaniacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20993 was submitted on Mar 24, 2018 07:20:26. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SixersWordmark.gif

The file File:SixersWordmark.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SportsnetOntario2011.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SportsnetOntario2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SportsnetPacific2011.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SportsnetPacific2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]