Category:Category-Class Michelin Guide articles
Appearance
![]() | Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | B | C | Start | Stub | ![]() | List | Category | Draft | File | Project | Redirect | Template | NA | ??? |
0 | 0 | 21 | 11 | 50 | 517 | 761 | 1 | 48 | 134 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 20 | 1 | 0 |
- Project home - WikiProject Food and drink
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Food and Drink}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
![]() |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Food and drink articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table). Purge server cache
Pages in category "Category-Class Michelin Guide articles"
The following 134 pages are in this category, out of 134 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
C
D
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in Canada
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in the Netherlands
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in the United States
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Amsterdam
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in California
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Canada
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Chicago
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Finland
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in France
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Illinois
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Ireland
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Japan
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in London
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Los Angeles
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Manhattan
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Nevada
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in New York (state)
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Norway
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in San Francisco
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Singapore
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Spain
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Sweden
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Thailand
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in the Czech Republic
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in the Netherlands
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in the United Kingdom
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in the United States
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Wales
- Category talk:Defunct Michelin-starred restaurants in Washington, D.C.
- Category talk:Draft-Class Michelin Guide articles
F
L
- Category talk:List-Class Michelin Guide articles
- Category talk:Lists of Michelin-starred restaurants
- Category talk:Lists of Michelin-starred restaurants in Asia
- Category talk:Lists of Michelin-starred restaurants in Europe
- Category talk:Lists of Michelin-starred restaurants in North America
- Category talk:Lists of Michelin-starred restaurants in the United States
M
- Category talk:Michelin Guide
- Category talk:Michelin Guide articles by quality
- Category talk:Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in Canada
- Category talk:Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in Singapore
- Category talk:Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in South Korea
- Category talk:Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in the Netherlands
- Category talk:Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in the United Kingdom
- Category talk:Michelin Guide Bib Gourmand restaurants in the United States
- Category talk:Michelin Guide task force
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Asian restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Chinese restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred European restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred European restaurants in the United States
- Category talk:Michelin-starred French restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred French restaurants in the United States
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Greek restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Indian restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Italian restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Italian restaurants in the United States
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Japanese restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Japanese restaurants in the United States
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Korean restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Latin American restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Mediterranean restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Mexican restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred New American restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants by country
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants by cuisine
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Amsterdam
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Austria
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Belgium
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Brazil
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Brooklyn
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in California
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Canada
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in China
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Colorado
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Denmark
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Finland
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Florida
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in France
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Georgia (U.S. state)
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Germany
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Hong Kong
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Hungary
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Illinois
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Ireland
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Italy
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Japan
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in London
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Los Angeles
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Luxembourg
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Malaysia
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Manhattan
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Mexico
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Monaco
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Nevada
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in New York (state)
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Norway
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in San Francisco
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Singapore
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in South Korea
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Spain
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Sweden
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Thailand
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in the Czech Republic
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in the Netherlands
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in the Netherlands navigational boxes
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in the United Kingdom
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Toronto
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Turkey
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Vancouver
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Wales
- Category talk:Michelin-starred restaurants in Washington, D.C.
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Spanish restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Taiwanese restaurants
- Category talk:Michelin-starred Thai restaurants