Category talk:Rocket engines by propellant

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles

Spaceflight

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles

Engineering

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles

Rename?

Per the recent Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_April_24#Category:Hydrogen_rocket_engines, does anyone have the time to organise a rename, as originally proposed, to

Nominator's rationale: These are rocket engines that use the named propellent for fuel. They aren't rockets for it, or rockets used by it - "Foo-fuelled" should be the standard for this sort of thing. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fuel (and separately oxidiser) vs. propellant is a significant distinction for rocket engines. Despite the usual subject-ignorant wikicrap neologism here, we should maintain the fuel / oxidiser distinction. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]