This category is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Oh I see, "C2F: One eponymous article" is being appealed to, but then in addition to Category:Squatting by country being a container category I'd cite WP:SMALLCAT: "Note also that this criterion does not preclude all small categories; a category which does have realistic potential for growth, such as a category for holders of a notable political office, may be kept even if only a small number of its articles actually exist at the present time" Mujinga (talk) 19:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is the right use of speedy renaming. Best to start a full CFD, or alternatively, if you think it's non-controversial, depopulate the small cats manually and they will be deleted by an admin as empty if no one objects. MClay1 (talk) 13:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
These were valid C2F nominations for speedy merging. However, out of this group, only Kazakhstan currently qualifies under C2F, as additional pages have been added into the others. – FayenaticLondon20:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
