Draft:Global Organic Textile Standard
Submission declined on 15 March 2024 by Shewasafairy (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Comment: all sources are WP:PRIMARY. She was afairy 09:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) is an organization that develops a standard for organic textiles and administers a third-party certification program to certify products complying with the standard[1].
There are two levels of certification: (1) Products that use at least 70% organic fibres can seek certification to be labeled as "made with (x%) organic materials."
(2) Products that use at least 95% organic fibres can seek certification to be labeled as "organic."[2][3]
History
[edit]GOTS was co-founded by four organizations: International Association Natural Textile Industry (IVN); Japan Organic Cotton Association (JOCA); Organic Trade Association (OTA); and Soil Association (SA). In 2006, GOTS published the first version of its standard and launched a third-party certification system. Since then, GOTS has periodically revised and updated the standard. As of February 2022, more than 12,000 facilities had been certified under the GOTS standard.[4]
References
[edit]- ^ "The Standard - GOTS".
- ^ "Organic Fibres - GOTS".
- ^ https://global-standard.org/images/resource-library/documents/standard-and-manual/GOTS_7.0_ENG_signed.pdf.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ "Story - GOTS".
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.