Draft:Gränges AB

• Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:NCORP) but presently it is not clear that it does.
  As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’.
  Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability.
  Please note that some of the references are not formatted correctly (see Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor and Wikipedia’s Manual of Style for help).
  Additionally, the draft does not appear to show that the subject has any notability beyond the average coverage in trade publications for similar corporations (see WP:ROTM).
  Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link).
  Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject.
  It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NCORP criteria #3, because XXXXX").
  Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 01:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

---

Gränges AB is a Swedish industrial company with a significant history, tracing its origins back to 1896 when it was founded as Trafik AB Grängesberg-Oxelösund (TGO). Initially a dominant force in Sweden’s mining and transport sectors and once the biggest company in Sweden, Gränges has undergone multiple transformations over the decades. Today, it is a global leader in aluminum technology, particularly in manufacturing products for heat exchangers. Gränges has production facilities in Sweden, Poland, China, and the United States.

Early Formation and Expansion

Gränges’ history is deeply tied to Sweden’s industrial rise in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The company was formed to manage the transportation of iron ore from the Grängesberg mines to the port of Oxelösund, capitalizing on the export boom of Sweden’s high-quality phosphorus-rich iron ore, crucial to European steel production.

British financier Ernest Cassel was instrumental in the company's early success. Cassel’s investment strategy aimed at consolidating control over Sweden’s iron ore resources, positioning Gränges as a major player in international mining and transport.

The Ivar Kreuger Era

In the 1920s, Ivar Kreuger, the infamous Swedish industrial magnate known as the "Match King," solidified his influence within Gränges. Kreuger’s business empire spanned several continents, and he helped Gränges acquire key assets, including mines in North Africa. Kreuger’s ambitious expansions, however, came crashing down during the financial turmoil following the 1929 Wall Street Crash. His death in 1932 precipitated a collapse of his financial empire, including his 22% stake in Gränges. The post-Kreuger era saw Gränges regain financial independence but left the company navigating a challenging economic landscape.

Gränges During World War II

During World War II, Gränges played a controversial role in Sweden’s iron ore trade with Nazi Germany. Sweden, officially neutral during the war, was a crucial supplier of iron ore, which the German war machine relied on for its steel production. Between 1939 and 1944, iron ore accounted for about 33% of Sweden’s exports to Germany, and Gränges was responsible for around 80% of this iron ore supply.

This trade, though crucial to maintaining Sweden's neutrality, has been criticized for indirectly supporting the Nazi war effort. Gränges' leadership, operating under the framework of Swedish government policy, maintained the exports even as the tide of war turned. Despite growing knowledge of Nazi atrocities, the iron ore shipments continued until 1944, contributing to an extended German military capability.

Nationalization and Post-War Crisis

In the post-war period, Gränges faced a new challenge. Since 1903 until the mid-20th century, Gränges held a controlling stake in Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB (LKAB), Sweden’s largest iron ore producer. However, in 1957, the Swedish government bought out Gränges’ stake for 900 million SEK, effectively nationalizing LKAB. This move was part of the broader state-driven shift toward controlling Sweden’s strategic natural resources.

This marked a turning point for Gränges, as the company sought to pivot away from iron ore mining. It reinvested its substantial state buyout funds into the steel industry and other sectors. One of the key initiatives during this period was the construction of a major steel plant in Oxelösund, which became one of Europe’s most advanced steel facilities.

The Decline: Stålkrisen and Global Competition

In the 1970s, Gränges, like much of the Western steel industry, was hit hard by the Stålkrisen (the Steel Crisis), a period marked by global overproduction and plummeting steel prices. Cheap steel imports from Japan and South Korea made it increasingly difficult for Swedish producers to remain competitive.

As Gränges struggled with mounting losses, its workforce, which had peaked at around 24,000 employees, faced mass layoffs. In 1977, the Swedish government and private stakeholders within the steel sector agreed to merge Gränges’ steel operations with other ailing companies to form SSAB, a state-owned steel conglomerate. The restructuring efforts were an attempt to save Sweden’s steel industry, but they also signaled the end of Gränges' dominance in the sector.

Electrolux: Predatory Capitalism or Rescue Mission?

By 1980, the Wallenberg-owned Electrolux acquired the company. Hans Werthén, chairman of Electrolux since 1974 and chairman of Gränges since 1977, orchestrated the deal, which involved stripping Gränges of its less profitable assets and leaving these for the government to handle before the acquisition, all the while retaining key businesses, such as its aluminum production operations and Autoliv.

Under Electrolux’s ownership, Gränges underwent a dramatic transformation. Several divisions were sold off and Electrolux focused on Gränges’ aluminum business, which eventually became the company’s core strength. This period of aggressive restructuring and asset stripping has been viewed by some as an example of predatory capitalism. However, others argue that Electrolux's actions saved the company from bankruptcy and paved the way for its future success.

Gränges’ Rebirth and Modernization

In 2013, Gränges re-emerged as an independent company, following its detachment from Electrolux. The newly reborn Gränges focused on aluminum technology, particularly for automotive heat exchangers. Its IPO in 2014 marked the start of a new era, with Gränges becoming a global leader in its niche market.

In 2016, Gränges received the International Star Award at the European Small and Mid-Cap Awards, recognizing its successful transformation and international expansion. Today, Gränges operates state-of-the-art production facilities across Europe, the United States, and Asia, positioning itself as a key supplier in the global aluminum industry.

Legacy and Controversy

Gränges’ journey from a dominant mining and transportation conglomerate to a high-tech aluminum producer is a story of industrial transformation, marked by strategic pivots, global competition, and political involvement. The company's legacy is intertwined with Sweden’s industrial development, wartime policies, and post-war economic strategies. Its role during World War II, its nationalization struggles, and its eventual takeover by Electrolux highlight the complex dynamics between state intervention, private enterprise, and global markets.