Draft talk:The Zhao Fuqiang Case
![]() | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Article problems
[edit]@Hzt0208042508415531 tw Hello! From the sources I can see it seems to be notable (though it is difficult to evaluate so I am not sure. The issues I have identified are as follows:
The problems are is that the grammar and structure is difficult to understand. Reading this article, it is difficult to follow the sequence of events. The lead does not properly introduce the topic and why it is notable, instead giving background information, leading to a confusing start. The lead should summarize the content in the body, not contain new information - maybe add a background section and put that content there? The lead should also say why it is notable.
Reading this article left me confused about what the topic was and its significance. I'm just not really sure about what this is - what about this case did the press covering it identify as significant? From what is here, it just reads as "some people got investigated" and that's it. It also needs some grammar copy editing as parts were hard to understand.
Also, if this was a translation from a Chinese article, you must link to the version it is translated from and say that it is a translation in an edit summary, for attribution reasons. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:41, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Draft-Class China-related articles
- NA-importance China-related articles
- Draft-Class China-related articles of NA-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Draft-Class Crime-related articles
- NA-importance Crime-related articles
- NA-Class Organized crime articles
- NA-importance Organized crime articles
- Organized crime task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles