Talk:Åkrogen
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The Globe and Mail
[edit]Hi. Reading the Globe and Mail article, I can see that they have confused Åkrogen Beachpark for either Den Permanente or Risskov Beachpark. Both of these are much closer to the city and smaller than Åkrogen. The only beach north of Aarhus where nudism and nakedness is allowed, is a small sandy stretch immediately south of the seabath Den Permanente. I think it was that small sandy stretch that the journalists visited. It is the only place that fits their description. RhinoMind (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Below is a couple of photographs I took of the nudist beach site I refers to. Out of courtesy (and Wikicommons guidelines) I didn't photographed any naked people of course.
-
The nudist beach with a view to the south and the city's skyline on a summers eve.
-
A northward view of the same stretch of beach with the seabath structures of Den Permanente on the horizon.