Talk:...Thirteen Years Later
Appearance
![]() | ...Thirteen Years Later has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 5, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from ...Thirteen Years Later appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 February 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:...Thirteen Years Later/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 15:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Just three minor issues:
- Perhaps begin the second paragraph of the lead with 'In this episode...' for clarity
- "The episode has evoked..." "It has evoked"
- Wikilink ‘1997–98 television season’ under note
A well written article. No dead links or dabs and could find no close-paraphrasing issues. Will pass once comments have been addressed. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Completed. DepressedPer (talk) 19:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sweet, happy to pass now. Lemonade51 (talk) 20:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Late getting to this—thanks to you both for the review and the fixes! GRAPPLE X 18:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.