Jump to content

Talk:1986 Atlantic hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1986 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star1986 Atlantic hurricane season is the main article in the 1986 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 15, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 27, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Images for each storm

[edit]
Nice and easy. Hurricanehink 14:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todo

[edit]

Generally the storm histories should be made a little more detailed. A couple of them don't even have dates given. — jdorje (talk) 08:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the only thing the Danielle and Earl need is the dates and their references. Earl stayed out to sea and Danielle was a minimal tropical storm. juan andrés 03:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I added more information to tropical storm Danielle, I hope you like it. If you don't like it, please modify it without mercy. juan andrés 03:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, added forgotten information about the formation as a tropical depression. juan andrés 03:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. Make sure to check your spelling. And don't use <ref> unless there's a <reference> section already in the article...just use inline links. — jdorje (talk) 03:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Finished Earl report. Dates added. juan andrés 23:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
201.130.162.111 its me, juan andrés 23:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC). Also corrected myself, taken off many "and"s[reply]

frustration

[edit]

UGHHH!, this is ridiculous!, why put a tcexpand banner if no one talks about it, all it does it just clutters up the seasonal article and degrades it, im removing this banner. Storm05 18:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THERE IS NOTHING TO TALK ABOUT. The section needs to be expanded. That's all. — jdorje (talk) 20:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I added more information to the section of Earl, but if the article needs more info, what can we do? It's an article, and naturally, needs to be improved every day. Everybody can say that banners are horrible in an article, but when article is need to be improved, they are very necessary. So I can't take out the banner until the section gets improved. juan andrés 19:54, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. You added enough, and it doesn't need to be improved any more. Good work. I removed the expand banner. Hurricanehink 20:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. juan andrés 03:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to know which are the criteria for putting the categories Stub, Start, Class B, Class A and FA. I will be very thankful. juan andrés 04:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The criteria haven't been discussed thorougly. You can see the criteria for pages in general at the Tropical cyclone articles by quality category. However nobody really spoke up when we were talking about them so I worked up my own tc-specific criteria when assessing them. For season articles, to be B-class it needs to have a non-stub mention of each storm. The {{tcexpand}} entries I added to some AHS season articles are because individual storms don't have enough detail. Good work improving the Earl section - I was too hasty in reverting storm05's edit (which itself concealed your change from my watchlist), and frustrated because he removed tcexpand from a number of articles simultaneously - all but this one were, I believe, unchanged from when the tcexpand was put there. — jdorje (talk) 08:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another possible storm?

[edit]

I was just looking through the archives, and this looks like a TD or a storm. Does anyone have the list of depressions from the year? Don't worry, I'm not going to add it in to the article. I was just curious if it was actually a TD. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's another one in late May that struck Belize and moved across Southeast Mexico during the first couple days of June. Looks like it was at least a TD. Thegreatdr 15:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good find, that does look nice. Oddly, it looked better over southeast Mexico than it did over Belize. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There was a tropical depression known as T.D. 4.Mitchazenia 16:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That occurred in August in the Gulf of Mexico, and isn't either of the aforementioned systems. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I did a little digging and discovered that San Francisco did classify it as TD 2E after it crossed Central America. I should have something online for that system on the rainfall project within the next week or two. Thegreatdr 20:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that's cool. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That particular system has a write up on page 2510 and 2512 of this year's MWR. The EPac MWR says it was just a disturbance in the Atlantic and that it lasted 12 hours only. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additional TD info

[edit]

Here is additional TD information. It is not reference-able, but should aid your search for information elsewhere. Happy hunting. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • 10900 7/23/1986 M= 6 1 SNBR= 174 XING=0 TD3
  • 10910 7/23* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*240 549 20 0*243 561 20 0*
  • 10920 7/24*246 575 20 0*248 589 25 0*250 600 25 0*255 610 25 0*
  • 10930 7/25*260 618 25 0*264 623 25 0*270 630 25 0*279 638 30 0*
  • 10940 7/26*285 642 30 0*294 649 30 0*300 655 30 0*312 653 25 0*
  • 10950 7/27*320 652 25 0*330 651 25 0*340 650 25 0*360 639 25 0*
  • 10960 7/28*378 625 20 0*385 610 20 0*412 598 20 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 10970 TD
  • 11020 8/30/1986 M= 6 3 SNBR= 176 XING=0 TD5
  • 11030 8/30* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*125 345 20 0*128 358 25 0*
  • 11040 8/31*130 370 25 0*132 382 25 0*133 395 25 0*138 408 30 0*
  • 11050 9/ 1*140 420 30 0*142 432 30 0*145 445 30 0*160 460 30 0*
  • 11060 9/ 2*170 470 30 0*182 482 30 0*194 497 30 0*208 509 30 0*
  • 11070 9/ 3*219 520 30 0*230 530 30 0*240 540 25 0*260 547 25 0*
  • 11080 9/ 4*272 552 25 0*290 556 25 0*308 560 20 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 11090 TD
  • 11100 9/ 1/1986 M= 4 4 SNBR= 177 XING=0 TD6
  • 11110 9/ 1* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0*176 862 20 0*180 878 20 0*
  • 11120 9/ 2*185 888 20 0*190 900 20 0*192 910 25 0*197 920 25 0*
  • 11130 9/ 3*200 930 25 0*202 940 30 0*207 950 30 0*211 961 30 0*
  • 11140 9/ 4*218 971 25 0*221 980 25 0*229 990 0 0* 0 0 0 0*
  • 11150 TD
Was Charley not given a number? It should be the fifth tropical depression.Potapych (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oy. Charley was assigned a number in real time. After consulting my database, the system previously listed as TD4 above was not assigned to be a TD until after the fact. Thegreatdr (talk) 09:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

[edit]

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "Noaa Danielle report" :
    • http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1986.pdf
    • [ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/pub/storm_archives/atlantic/prelimat/atl1986/danielle/prelim01.gif]

DumZiBoT (talk) 20:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1986 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1986 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1986 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]