Talk:19 January 2006 Osama bin Laden tape
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 19 January 2006 Osama bin Laden tape article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Sources
[edit]This site is a JOKE.
Who here thinks that Prisonplanet, WhatReallyHappened, and Information Clearing House are reliable sources? [1]--Jersey Devil 05:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Clearly they are not reliable sources for information about reality. I would have said they were reliable sources for what conspiracists think, but I'm no longer entirely convinced of even that. Tom Harrison Talk 14:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Label us as "conspiracists" if you want, i call it "realists", but to answer your question: yes, they are a reliable source for what themselves thinks and also for what those subscribing to their view think.--Striver 15:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Check out some more information Alex Jones gives us. Using him as a source for an encyclopedia? Uh-oh... I'd say he has less credibility than some Joe Q. Random's blog. Conspiracy theories sell, and Mr. Jones is a pro. (But I'm only saying this because I'm one of the secret immortal rulers of the world and Mr. Jones uncovered our plan to kill 80% of the world population. Foolish of us to leave our plans on our secret web sites for him to find!) Weregerbil 15:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- "Conspiracy theories sell" This is why I'm not sure these sites are most representative of what conspiracy theorists are saying. I'm afraid those who are best at self-promotion are over-represented.
- "I'm only saying this because I'm one of the secret immortal rulers..." No doubt that's what you'd like us to think. Tom Harrison Talk 16:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
And now even with a consensus reached in the talk page the user continues to revert to add his own POV.--Jersey Devil 17:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
I notice the title of this article is a bit misleading, as two tapes have been published in 2006. The one the article refers to, and another on the 23rd of April. Just FYI
Merge
[edit]I moved some content to the more comprehensive article Videos of Osama bin Laden. Otto 22:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Dead link
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20060119/1057464.asp
- In 19 January 2006 Osama bin Laden tape on 2011-05-25 06:47:05, 404 Not Found
- In 19 January 2006 Osama bin Laden tape on 2011-06-21 05:22:56, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 2
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/4023190.html
- In 19 January 2006 Osama bin Laden tape on 2011-05-25 06:47:05, 404 Not Found
- In 19 January 2006 Osama bin Laden tape on 2011-06-21 05:23:15, 404 Not Found