Talk:2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/tc2005bt.htm
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:00:45, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 05:41:06, 404 Not Found
  • In 2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 07:36:39, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/tc2006bt.htm
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:00:45, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:05, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 05:40:56, 404 Not Found
  • In 2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 07:36:49, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.wmo.ch/web/www/TCP/OperationPlans/TCP21-OP2005.pdf
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:00:45, 404 Not Found
  • In 2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-05-25 08:03:07, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 05:41:15, 404 Not Found
  • In 2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season on 2011-06-10 07:36:58, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Juliancolton (talk · contribs) 01:37, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Some comments...

• where a dam was opened and inundated the town overnight. - a dam being opened usually signifies deliberate flood-mitigating procedure, but this sounds more like a breach/break. Clarify?

• It was deliberate though. I added "excess water" to the storm's section, and "deliberately" to the lead. That work? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

• and used the Dvorak technique to estimate intensity - probably not a big deal, but do they use an automated Dvorak algorithm?

• Not sure. It just says the T numbers were estimated. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

• Offshore, between 1,500 and 2,000 fishing vessels lost contact with the mainland. [...] Thousands of fishing vessels were lost during the storm, leaving 950 fishermen missing immediately after the storm, which prompted a helicopter search. - I think this might need to be reconciled a bit. I'm not sure whether there's a distinction between the first and second lines in this excerpt, and it's a little jarring to read that less than a thousand people were missing on upwards of 1,500 ships.

• I removed the "thousands of fishing vessels" part, didn't realize it was there before. However, the sources are unfortunately contradictory. The initial report was that there were 1,500 to 2,000 vessels missing. Sadly, there was no update, and the next report said 950 fishermen missing, but despite several hours of searching, I never read of their fate. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

• Aided by low wind shear beneath the subtropical ridge - this is major nitpicking, but low shear is no "aiding" factor... it's just not an inhibiting one.

• Gotcha, switched. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

• the JTWC issued a TCFA - TCFA should be linked/spelled out on its first usage.

• Fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Just a few little things. I'll gladly list the article as a GA once these are addressed. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:37, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Hope it's better now. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Works for me. Great work! – Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2001 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130117014848/http://typhoon2000.ph/garyp_mgtcs/dec01.txt to http://www.typhoon2000.ph/garyp_mgtcs/dec01.txt
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080116195620/http://www.imd.gov.in/services/cyclone/impact.htm to http://www.imd.gov.in/services/cyclone/impact.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 17 June 2017 (UTC)