Jump to content

Talk:2009–10 Football Conference

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salisbury City administration - points deduction?

[edit]

Salisbury City entered administration at the start of the 2009-10 season, and the standard penalty for that is a 10 point deduction. Should I apply it even though no official sources have indicated it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkyduncan (talkcontribs) 19:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, we have to wait for a decent source to show the deduction. We can't pre-empt the official sites etc. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Found one here [1], and the story is well spread around on various reliable sources. I'll add it now. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chester City

[edit]

Although the team is expelled, the result is still "effective" until the end of appeal process. Chester City still -3 points.[2] Matthew_hk tc 20:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the table remains as it is until the appeal is decided one way or the other. Only then will Chester be removed and the other teams' results adjusted. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism!

[edit]

I corrected Gray's relegation to 8. league in the league system, but anybody made it wrong again! What's all this crap?! --188.193.48.139 (talk) 19:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, calm down. Accusing people of vandalism is not a good way to go about things. Secondly, you're wrong. Grays weren't relegated to level 8 - they were demoted to the Conference South but chose to re-apply to level 8. Anyway, there's no template for level 8 so you just created a redlink. Bretonbanquet (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on 2009–10 Football Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on 2009–10 Football Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2009–10 Football Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on 2009–10 Football Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]