Jump to content

Talk:2009 U.S. Open Cup qualification

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

What happened to the state qualifying for this tournament? Since even MLS clubs have to qualify to get into the tournament, the state and PDL qualifying information needs to be in there too. This is an encyclopedia, after all. JeffConn (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We will only include the USASA Regional tournaments once information about them is released, just as we did last year and the year before that. MLS, USL (USL-1, USL-2, and PDL), and USASA qualifying will be included, but the state by state USASA qualifying tournaments are simply too much. There is only limited information about these tournaments and there are simply too many to include and still do it well. -- Grant.Alpaugh 04:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why were the teams switched around? Traditionally the home side is featured on the left when showing the opposing teams. I know this is different in the United States but it is more appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartan008 (talkcontribs) 21:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The format in U.S. and Canadian soccer articles is Away-Home. -- Grant.Alpaugh 21:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


For the qualification of the teams from the USASA, I think that only a bracket is necessary to display. Game details themselves would be a waste in my opinion based on importance. Just wanted to run that by anyone involved in this article. Spartan008 (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The goal is to put as much information as we can on here, while being consistent throughout. We have at least the information on where all games were played through USOpenCup.com, however we only have a few of the full stat lines for the game, which we can hopefully fill in at some point. But considering this is qualification for our national cup, the USASA qualifications deserve to have as much information as the MLS qualifying does. Mtndrums (talk) 09:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2009 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]