Talk:2010 Zahedan bombings
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Zahedan bombings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A news item involving 2010 Zahedan bombings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 17 July 2010. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of 2010 Zahedan bombings be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Page move
[edit]This page and 2010 Zahedan mosque bombings were created at roughly the same time and thus overlapped. I moved the info to the bigger page, the other page maybe a better move? Does anyone have a word on that?Lihaas (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- either article is OK. would prefer to include Mosque in the title though for ease of searching.--Wikireader41 (talk) 04:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, i though that too. Let's wait and see if there are comments to this message in the next few days, if not we can move it?Lihaas (talk) 10:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
"Reaction" section of article
[edit]There is absolutely no reason to add US propaganda to this article. If you must: 1. Keep it brief so that US denials or declarations do not overwhelm the material presented in this article. 2. Balance it with the declarations from other leaders particularly those that see US without a neutral viewpoint on this subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.80.241.154 (talk) 22:37, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- It is a referenced statement which is germane to the subject. Replacing it with the words "denying support" removes context and severely skews meaning. The article already contains a statement by Iran's deputy interior minister. Removing the US portion from the article because you feel it is "propaganda" is simply a POV edit. Taroaldo (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Youre free to add other statement to the contrary provided they are sourced. Both US denials and Iranian accusation are a matter of [sourced] fact.Lihaas (talk) 01:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- I dont see any US 'propaganda' in the article. Clintons statements are very important especially considering current US-Iran tensions. of course reactions of other prominent world leaders (for example Saudi King and other Arab Sunni leaders) would be welcome.--Wikireader41 (talk) 03:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Youre free to add other statement to the contrary provided they are sourced. Both US denials and Iranian accusation are a matter of [sourced] fact.Lihaas (talk) 01:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
aftermath section
[edit]does anyone think its warranted? Ie- the MP resignation and possible repercussions/crackdowns/other attacks.Lihaas (talk) 10:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 Zahedan bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.almanar.com.lb/newssite/NewsDetails.aspx?id=147229&language=en - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100721180056/http://www.presstv.ir:80/detail.aspx?id=135504§ionid=351020101 to http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=135504§ionid=351020101
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.islamidavet.com/english/2010/07/18/third-mp-resigns-over-zahedan-blasts/ - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100717191628/http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=135194§ionid=351020101 to http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=135194§ionid=351020101
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 Zahedan bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100720193827/http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=135320§ionid=351020101 to http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=135320§ionid=351020101
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=135504§ionid=351020101
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)