Talk:2013 Northeastern China Smog

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2013 Northeastern China Smog redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

A news item involving 2013 Northeastern China Smog was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 23 October 2013.

Wikipedia

China

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles

Disaster management

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles

Notable

the discussion at AFD was close din 1 day an it was not unanimous now was there reaso for the speedy keep designation. The article further has nothign on the SMOG itself jsut teh CAUSE and the IMPACT. That is before and after. What about the vent? If that its then it can go on pollution in china.

Also jsut because there ARE rs sorucfes doesnt mean they have to be notable enough to be used here.(Lihaas (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

WP:SPEEDYKEEP says that if "the article is currently linked from the Main Page" that is a valid reason for a speedy keep. From the closing admin's comments on Lihaas' talk page it doesn't look like that was the rationale. —rybec 17:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fake interwikis

What is going on with the repeated re-insertion of fake interwiki links by User:Jax 0677? I don't think you understand what interwiki links are for. Please do not re-insert them again. A reminder that ownership of articles is forbidden, and you shouldn't make reverts because of perceived ownership. --benlisquare_T•C•E 14:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - I never claimed ownership, and bots have usually taken care of the interwiki links. I considered the 2013 Harbin smog a subset of Harbin, the person before undid my edit without explanation, but I will refrain until there is an article about the 2013 Harbin smog itself. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you want to add an interwiki, it's better to do it properly on Wikidata, instead of relying on bots. That way, you can also realise if there is a problematic mismatch. --benlisquare_T•C•E 17:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]