Talk:2018 United States Senate election in Tennessee
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@AlPolitico please stop vandalizing page
[edit]Deleting content to push polictical agenda Devereux1859 (talk) 22:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Moved Larry Crim
[edit]He is a Democrat, not a Republican — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.121.156.18 (talk) 15:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- I moved him back, the source states he is in the GOP primary this time. 331dot (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Grand Division
[edit]2020 United States presidential election in Tennessee#General election has the exact same thing that was added a while back ago. Why should this one be different if there is already a image? GatewayPolitics (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Glman if we can't reach an agreement, I feel like we should get more opinions GatewayPolitics (talk) 20:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think it should be removed from the other article as well. What reason do you believe it warrants inclusion? It appears to be WP:OR, and the grand divisions are largely symbolic. They don't vote as a bloc. The talk page should attract more opinions, but I can ping the WikiProject. glman (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Citation for the election was provided. I had to add up the county results for the grand divisions. Yeah I think we should get a general consensus GatewayPolitics (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but doing that work is WP:OR. Regardless, why do you think it warrants inclusion? glman (talk) 20:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I believe so, I would add this citation instead which I would argue is not original research[1] GatewayPolitics (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Glman if I were to add that citation would that be suitable? GatewayPolitics (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm interested in the reasoning for adding it to the article. Not all information is worthy of inclusion per WP:ONUS. glman (talk) 21:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- It provides additional information and maybe will Peak interests of individuals about the grand divisions in tennessee. GatewayPolitics (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- And a lot of people do like analyzing State results to the finest details, I see no harm in having this added in the article GatewayPolitics (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a database of all information, I just don't believe this info warrants inclusion on the Encyclopedia. I've mentioned this discussion over at the WikiProject. glman (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, I'm fine if that's the conclusion. I just thought that it would bring more data breakdown to the article and would benefit it GatewayPolitics (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a database of all information, I just don't believe this info warrants inclusion on the Encyclopedia. I've mentioned this discussion over at the WikiProject. glman (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- And a lot of people do like analyzing State results to the finest details, I see no harm in having this added in the article GatewayPolitics (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- It provides additional information and maybe will Peak interests of individuals about the grand divisions in tennessee. GatewayPolitics (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm interested in the reasoning for adding it to the article. Not all information is worthy of inclusion per WP:ONUS. glman (talk) 21:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Glman if I were to add that citation would that be suitable? GatewayPolitics (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I believe so, I would add this citation instead which I would argue is not original research[1] GatewayPolitics (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but doing that work is WP:OR. Regardless, why do you think it warrants inclusion? glman (talk) 20:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Citation for the election was provided. I had to add up the county results for the grand divisions. Yeah I think we should get a general consensus GatewayPolitics (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think it should be removed from the other article as well. What reason do you believe it warrants inclusion? It appears to be WP:OR, and the grand divisions are largely symbolic. They don't vote as a bloc. The talk page should attract more opinions, but I can ping the WikiProject. glman (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "2018 Tennessee senate election by Grand division". Daves Redistricting. Retrieved 2024-02-22.
Categories:
- Start-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- Start-Class U.S. Congress articles
- Unknown-importance U.S. Congress articles
- WikiProject U.S. Congress events
- Start-Class Tennessee articles
- Low-importance Tennessee articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- Start-Class American politics articles
- Mid-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class US State Legislatures articles
- Unknown-importance US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject US State Legislatures articles
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Unknown-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Years articles
- Unknown-importance Years articles
- Start-Class Years articles of Unknown-importance