Talk:2020 Malian parliamentary election
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
First round
[edit]The definitive results for the first round have been proclamed by the Constitutional Court yesterday, as can be seen on the french page [1] with a secondary source giving the seat repartition [2]. As with the previous election, I don't think it's possible to give votes per parties, as they are all mixed up together in large common lists.--Aréat (talk) 03:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
I added the full results per constituencies [3] for the record, but with the mix of several lists in different ways so many times, I don't see how it could be used to fill the current table.--Aréat (talk) 21:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a mess – it would be ok if the alliances were consistent across the country, but each constituency seems to have its own random combinations. Perhaps we should just have a table here with seats per party, and a separate article Results of the 2020 Malian parliamentary election where we could potentially list the results by constituency with all the list combinations. Number 57 21:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Well, we still have the numbers for the invalid and valid votes, registered voters and turnout at the national level, so there would be a separate smaller tables with them if we did one with only the seats. And with a comment explaining to readers why national numbers per parties aren't being shown, like "In multimembers constituencies, Malian parties traditionnaly forms larges common lists whose composition change from one to another. Due to this, numbers of voter per parties aren't compiled here at the national level". What do you think? As for a detailled article, that would be a lot of work!--Aréat (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Perhaps we could have a table something like the below (with colours, I just ignored that for ease of putting it together), just so it all fits in one thing. Agree about the note. Re the detailed article, if the pdf can be converted to a word document, it would make a lot less work, although still quite time consuming... Number 57 22:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Well, we still have the numbers for the invalid and valid votes, registered voters and turnout at the national level, so there would be a separate smaller tables with them if we did one with only the seats. And with a comment explaining to readers why national numbers per parties aren't being shown, like "In multimembers constituencies, Malian parties traditionnaly forms larges common lists whose composition change from one to another. Due to this, numbers of voter per parties aren't compiled here at the national level". What do you think? As for a detailled article, that would be a lot of work!--Aréat (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Party | Seats | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
First round |
Second round |
Total | +/– | |
Rally for Mali | 10 | |||
Union for the Republic and Democracy | 4 | |||
Total | 22 | 125 | 147 | 0 |
Votes cast | First round | Second round | ||
Votes | % | Votes | % | |
Valid votes | 2,603,157 | 95.48 | ||
Invalid/blank votes | 123,135 | 4.52 | ||
Total | 2,726,292 | 100 | 100 | |
Registered voters/turnout | 7,663,464 | 35.58 |
- Look good to me. ;) --Aréat (talk) 06:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)