Talk:3121
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 3121 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]"The number also has relevance to the release dates of the album and debut single. "Te Amo Corazon" was released December 13, 2005 (or 12/13, which backwards is 3121). The album itself is being released on March 21, 2006 (or 3/21, which is 3121 without the first 1). The second single from 3121 ("Black Sweat") runs for 3:12 minutes (which is 3121 without the last digit)."
Where did this come from? Each statement seems more ridiculous than the previous (3121 without the last digit????)
- AH. SO WHAT DO I SEE? Someone else completely irritated by this bullsh**. Me too, bud! Reminds me of those silly number-guessing-games played on date of NY terrorist attacks: ("Use Windows Symbol font and assign ..."). Oh well. We do not need this in WP, do we? -andy 80.129.105.81 14:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Is the portion about the "purple ticket" a joke?
Where did the album debut #1 on the charts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.34.83.114 (talk) 12:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:3121/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
For B class, article needs composer information for tracklist. Also, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums for formatting of personnel. |
Last edited at 01:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 5 July 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved as clear consensus has been established. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Music1201 talk 20:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
3121 (album) → 3121 – Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please present Google Books or Google News Archive results before providing other web results. Do not sign this. Antoine Indiana (talk) 15:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
It redirects here already. There is no chance that "3121" will mean anything outside of the album on Wikipedia.
- Support The only possible alternative meaning is the year, but that's way too far in the future. Timmyshin (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Looks like the primary topic based on page view data, even when you take into account the massive surge of interest following Prince's death earlier this year. Other possible meanings include 3121 (number), the year 3121 BC and minor planet 3121 Tamines, but these are all redirects that recieve minimal views. PC78 (talk) 15:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ridiculous – A number as title for an article on an album fails WP:CRITERIA recognizability, precision, consistency, and perhaps more. Dicklyon (talk) 21:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- It's going to be a number anyway... Nohomersryan (talk) 05:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support per Timmyshin/PC78. Nohomersryan (talk) 05:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 3121. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106232915/http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0320063prince4.html to http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0320063prince4.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)