Jump to content

Talk:35th Battalion (New Zealand)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 11:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This article is in good shape. I have a few comments:

  • in the lead, suggest "during a partial demobilisation" to avoid part and partial so close together
  • Nandi Bay→Nadi Bay and link Nadi
  • link Royal New Zealand Air Force
  • first name for Lieutenant Colonel Tomline?
  • New Calendonia→New Caledonia
  • perhaps modify the sentence beginning "By this time, the support company..." by explicitly stating that support company was converted into a fourth rifle company, if that is what happened? How odd that they didn't keep their Vickers guns and mortars, surely they would have been helpful in the jungle?
  • "the battalion's commanding officer, Lieutenant Colonel Seaward, "→"Seaward"
  • there are a few examples of the dropping of the definite article in front of ordinals like 35th and 37th
  • after inflicting some damagecasualties
  • "upon reporting to mobilisation centres the remaining members of the battalion found it had been effectively disbanded."
  • Lieutenant Colonel Seaward→Seaward
  • I'm not sure if Seaward and Moffat are actually notable, if there is any likelihood of them being so, suggest redlinking them at first mention in the body and infobox, if not, remove from infobox
  • File:Loading LCI, Vella Lavella 1944.jpg licence doesn't look right. Is there such a thing as PD-NZGov? It seems this would probably fall into Crown copyright if it is an official photograph?

Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Nice work on this. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peacemaker67, thanks for looking at this. I have made edits and responded to your comments above. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:47, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by acceptably licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:17, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]