Talk:55th (West Lancashire) Division/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Catlemur (talk · contribs) 16:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
I will begin the review shortly.--Catlemur (talk) 16:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Add Categories: Military units and formations disestablished in 1919 and 1919 disestablishments in the United Kingdom.
- Break ref 55 into into separate ones.
- Separated EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Use a comma instead of and in ref 163, for the sake of consistency.
- with the aggressive German Empire→ Remove aggressive, I would argue that all empires at the time were aggressive to a certain degree.
- What was the division's strength at formation?
- I have added an extra line to state what the expected establishment was, and that it was not achieved across the board. I have not found seen a source stating what the division actually achieved (closest being what is the article stating how far below establishment it was). EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- After a period out of the line resting→After a period of resting out of the line--Catlemur (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Changed EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Wikilink creeping barrage
- Link added EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- "the 165th Brigade"
- Throughout the article yards are converted to miles in some cases but not in others. This should be done consistently.
- Updated to just meters. EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Is it comrades' association or Comrades Association?
- "comrades' " is the term used by the source. EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- practise→practice
- British English verb EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Some image captions end in a full stop while others do not. This should be done consistently.
- I have added some, where I believe they are appropriate. Some of the captions are not full sentences, and shouldn't have a period. EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Who's Who. London: A & C Black. 1910. → This source is not cited a single time in the article.
- Updated, so it should now show in the references. It was previously used, but showed as "WW".
Thank you for your review. I have attempted to address the various points you have raised above.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
--Catlemur (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: