Talk:5 O'Clock (Nonchalant song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 5 O'Clock (Nonchalant song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 1

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move discussion diverted to: Talk:5 O'clock (song)#Requested move 2 Mike Cline (talk) 17:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

5 O'Clock → 5 O'Clock (Nonchalant song) –

Relisted since the related one was relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also Talk:5 O'clock#Requested move.

Do not move The Nonchalant song is called "5 O'Clock", while the T-Pain song is called "5 O'clock". No need to move the page. Ian Streeter (talk) 13:22, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support disambiguation is needed. 5:00pm is also quitting time, etc. 70.24.248.23 (talk) 04:50, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No need for disambiguation page Both articles have hatnotes, which is sufficient. -- Jab7842 (talk) 07:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Support renaming from 5 O'Clock to "5'O'Clock (Nonchalant song)". It will make things less confusing for readers. Please see my (and others) related comments at the discussion regarding the proposed re-naming of another song titled 5 O'clock (song). The discussion is located here: Talk:5 O'clock (song)#Requested move. Thanks. MsBatfish (talk) 11:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. We use parenthetical disambiguation only when natural disambiguation is "not possible," according to WP:PRECISION. It is permitted for titles to, "differ only in their detail." Kauffner (talk) 02:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this can be closed as superceded by a new discussion. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 05:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The article 5 O'Clock has been proposed at WP:Requested moves to be renamed and moved to 5 O'Clock (Nonchalant song). All discussion regarding this proposed move will take place at the Talk page for the article 5 O'clock (song) which is located here: Talk:5 O'clock (song)#Requested move 2. Please place all comments there. There is new rationale for this move. Thank you. MsBatfish (talk) 08:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:5 O'clock (song) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]