Talk:60 Minutes (Australian TV program)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commentary
[edit]"The decline of 60 Minutes as a hard hitting current affairs program is a cause of worry for academics across the nation." Blatant commentary and very strangely put as well. Deleted, although discussion welcome. Cyril Washbrook 11:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:60MinutesTeam.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:60MinutesTeam.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:New60minutes.jpg
[edit]The image File:New60minutes.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --16:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Mark Latham criticism
[edit]There should be at least something hear mentioning the criticism involving Mark Latham as a reporter for 60 seconds. Should be worth noting. --Victory93 (talk) 10:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
File:60 Minutes Logo.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:60 Minutes Logo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian television articles
- Low-importance Australian television articles
- WikiProject Australian television articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles