Talk:68-pounder gun/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Nice work
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Fix capitalization of titles in references as per WP:CAPS#Composition titles. Did the formal name of the 80-pdr include the hyphens? If not then add them to that paragraph.
- A. Prose quality:
- This gun was typically referred to formally as "68-pr. of 95 cwts., S.B." in British manuals and tables. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 08:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Windage calculation needs to clarify that it's .1 inch on each side of the shell.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Cheers Sturmvogel. Think I've got everything - also found a copy of Lambert's book in a second hand shop today, bargain at £4! Ranger Steve (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Lambert's great. It will be key if I ever start work on the Warrior article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:36, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Cheers Sturmvogel. Think I've got everything - also found a copy of Lambert's book in a second hand shop today, bargain at £4! Ranger Steve (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)