Talk:86th Infantry Brigade Combat Team
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 86th Infantry Brigade Combat Team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100421111238/http://www.freewebs.com/mntinfantry/index.htm to http://www.freewebs.com/mntinfantry/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
CSIB and Unit Patch Inaccuracy
[edit]Say, didn't the 86th IBCT (MTN) just repatch back to it's former, buck's head patch? Most Soldiers of this BCT don't wear the former, 10th Mountain Division patch anymore. Perhaps a talented, Wiki editor can research and update this page to reflect the change? Barbwire45 (talk) 21:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have been trying but cannot find any official articles or documentation to support the move back to the cooler looking SSI, just anecdotal evidence. --McChizzle (talk) 21:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- @McChizzle: Based on these recent news articles, I think you're right. This one (photo 3) and this one. Look at the shoulder sleeve insignia and it's pretty clear that they're wearing the stag's head not the crossed swords. I'll try to find something official so the change to the article can be made.
- @McChizzle: Here's another article I think supports your contention.
- Done. --McChizzle (talk) 14:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class Vermont articles
- Low-importance Vermont articles
- WikiProject Vermont articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- B-Class United States military history articles