Talk:88rising
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Requested move 29 January 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. See no opposition to this proposal per se. An important issue might be uppercase vs. lowercase of the "r" in "rising", so there is no prejudice toward further discussion to see which is best for this article. However, removal of the space appears to be an acceptable edit. ♥Happy ♥Hearts ♥Day! (closed by page mover) Paine Ellsworth put'r there 11:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
88 Rising → 88rising – Founder of the company and news sources accord that the correct spelling for the company is 88rising. Fernandillo1 (talk) 02:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- WP:TITLETM. The sources in the article do not agree on this. Forbes uses 88Rising and Bloomberg users 88rising. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- The Bloomberg article uses both "88rising" (in 13 places) and "88Rising" (in two places). —BarrelProof (talk) 11:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: CNN used "88 Rising". —BarrelProof (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, however, that is one out of six articles presented in this discussion that used it overwhelmingly. What we are looking at is which spelling is used constantly throughout the various independent articles and only having one article is not supportive of maintaining the spelling as is. Fernandillo1 (talk) 06:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- WP:TITLETM. I agree with the point JJMC89 brings attention to. In accordance to Article title format in Standard English and trademarks, "Article titles follow standard English text formatting in the case of trademarks, unless the trademarked spelling is demonstrably the most common usage in sources independent of the owner of the trademark."
- While CNN does use "88 Rising", the references on the Wikipedia page such as Bloomberg and Forbes use "88rising" and "88Rising" respectively. Additionally, other sources not included on the Wikipedia page such as Billboard, Noisey, and Highsnobiety use "88rising" with Billboard using "88Rising" only in the title.
- The issue at hand is on how the title uses a space in between the letters. From the independent sources, what we see is a correlation in that most sources have the name together rather than separated. Therefore, the wording should stay together.
- Now, whether the spelling should be 88rising or 88Rising should be discussed. With the various sources, "88rising" is apparent to be the title for the Wikipedia page as it is used commonly within the sources, while in formality "88Rising" seems to be effective.
- Fernandillo1 (talk) 05:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Page Move
[edit]I have moved the page from 88 Rising to 88Rising — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topkekin (talk • contribs) 17:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Reverted. See the RM above. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:55, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Artists section
[edit]As per WP:LISTPEOPLE, all musical artists added to this article must be notable by Wikipedia standards. Currently, Josh Pan does not have a Wikipedia article, and therefore, must not be listed here! Jalen Folf (talk) 07:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)