Talk:A Whole New Mind

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi, I didn't write this article nor do I know the writer and although it might seem like an advertisement for the book, there is sufficient information on the links provided and the book does appear to have notability by the mentioned sources. If you want to get rid of it that's fine but I don't think it's silly, it seems like a perfectly valid article to me. Please provide a reason for deletion however because this is not nonsense and there are cited sources that show the notability of the book.

Thanks, Vaniac 01:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added more information

I'm not posting an advertisement. I recently read the book and wanted to create an entry for it in the wiki. I've added more detail.

Great, I think I'll pick up a copy, but the summary on the site you provided seems to suffice as a resource for now. If anybody still feels that this article should be deleted, please contact me, I see no reason why it is not Wikipedia-worthy material. Vaniac 03:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Whole New Mind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]