Talk:Abdellah Ouzghar
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abdellah Ouzghar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Abdellah Ouzghar be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Suspect translation
[edit]"...forgery, uttering a forged document..." Eh?! We don't utter a document. I wonder if "possessing" or "using" are the intended verbs? --Mashford 20:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- "Authoring", maybe? Propaniac 01:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry guys, but "uttering a document" is a perfectly legitimate expression. See: [1]. Geo Swan 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm..not perfectly legitimate. I yield its use specifically in legal contexts, but not in general. Semantic accuracy equates "utter" with "speak", "say" or otherwise strictly verbal expression. However, legality places a subtly different demand on language, which I recognize here by not getting into a bigger fuss. ;-) Mashford 01:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- It depends entirely upon what the French charging document actually says. In many American laws, the language "uttering a forged instrument" still exists, and if it's in the statute, that's the language the prosecuting attorney will use to charge the defendant. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 05:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm..not perfectly legitimate. I yield its use specifically in legal contexts, but not in general. Semantic accuracy equates "utter" with "speak", "say" or otherwise strictly verbal expression. However, legality places a subtly different demand on language, which I recognize here by not getting into a bigger fuss. ;-) Mashford 01:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry guys, but "uttering a document" is a perfectly legitimate expression. See: [1]. Geo Swan 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Abdellah Ouzghar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930014538/http://www.hamiltonspectator.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=hamilton%2FLayout%2FArticle_Type1&c=Article&cid=1168642210734&call_pageid=1020420665036&col=1014656511815 to http://www.hamiltonspectator.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=hamilton%2FLayout%2FArticle_Type1&c=Article&cid=1168642210734&call_pageid=1020420665036&col=1014656511815
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)