Talk:Accelerated Evolution/GA1

GA Review

Hello. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. Check back for my analysis. Tim meh !_{(review me)} 22:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist and analysis

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The release section seems a bit short. Have any singles been released for this album? If so, how have they done on music charts? Has the album itself appeared on any major charts? Has the Devin Townsend Band toured in support of the album, and where have they done so?
OK, I added some information. There were no singles (Townsend's only released one single in his career) and as an independent album it didn't sell very well, although it had a minor appearance on the charts in France. —Gendralman (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Unanimous praise? Really? Is there not one reviewer that had anything negative to say about the album, even within a generally positive review?
They didn't intend it literally, I'm sure, but I see your point about NPOV. I kept the source but adjusted the wording. —Gendralman (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I'll wait for my questions to be answered before taking any further action. Tim meh !_{(review me)} 22:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've passed the article, as my concerns have been addressed. Thanks for quickly responding, and good luck with this and other articles in the future. Tim meh !_{(review me)} 23:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]