Jump to content

Talk:Accessibility of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis (talk · contribs) 14:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this article. This is a long wing, and may take some time to complete this review. I have taken some notes from the previous failed nomination to guide along this review, making sure all valid concerns in the previous review has been addressed. GeraldWL 14:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Kew Gardens 613, first check:[reply]

Epicgenius, sorry for the delay! I'll be looking on the article thoroughly now. GeraldWL 13:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerald Waldo Luis: Thanks for the comments. Though I'm not the nominator, I've addressed some of these issues. It is slightly harder to address some of the others, because they are intended as legend notations rather than actual prose. Epicgenius (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Commuter rail

[edit]

Buses

[edit]
  • "However, private operators retained non-accessible buses. The last non-accessible bus on any New York City public transit, Motor Coach Industries' Classic (SC40-102A), ran on these private routes (which later became part of MTA Bus Company) until it was retired in 2007." Uncited. GeraldWL 12:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • minus Removed

Future accessible stations

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.