Talk:Acrasidae

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

As I also put on the page about "Kingdom Discicristates" there are only six officially recognized kingdoms: Archaebacteria, Eubacteria, Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, and Protista. I am almost sure that Acrasiomycota belongs in Kingdom Protista, but I haven't changed it because I would like verification. If anyone knows for sure, they should move it there. 69.15.134.58 (talk) 16:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at the page on discicristates, and it now says that discicristates is a "group" rather than a kingdom. Just letting you know. I changed this page's reference to discicristates to "group", just to keep it consistent. Pafferguy (talk) 22:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I moved Acrasiomycota/mycetes to family status, in order to be harmonized with the rest of protist content. --Wlodzimierz (talk) 09:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]