Talk:Adhesive bonding
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer Note
[edit]This draft appears to satisfy notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Concur that the topic is notable. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment
[edit]This draft covers the broader topic of adhesion bonding better than the existing article which was specifically stated in its lead as intended to cover a subset of the topic relating to the special techniques used in wafer bonding. The existing article could be renamed, possibly Adhesive bonding of wafers, and this draft could take over as the broader scope article using the existing title. Some splitting and merging may be required as attempts have been made to generalise the exixting article with content that may be more appropriate in this or other articles. @Robert McClenon: for discussion. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- User:Pbsouthwood, User:Feicanews, User:JJMC89 - I think that this is a case where a good-faith effort to redirect what looked like a duplicate draft to the existing article has hidden useful draft content. I will be undoing the redirect so that the draft can be discussed and compared against the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Robert McClenon, I agree, and that looks like an appropriate response. Ping me if I can help. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 08:45, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Since the draft is still drawing inappropriate urges to merge, I will rename the original article as I suggested above so that this draft can use the title. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Done, I will now move this draft into mainspace. If anyone has a problem with this, please read both articles, take note of the different scopes, and explain why you think they are so similar that merging would be more appropriate. Then we can have a rational discussion of whether the renamed narrow scope article should be merged into this one. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Since the draft is still drawing inappropriate urges to merge, I will rename the original article as I suggested above so that this draft can use the title. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Robert McClenon, I agree, and that looks like an appropriate response. Ping me if I can help. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 08:45, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- User:Pbsouthwood, User:Feicanews, User:JJMC89 - I think that this is a case where a good-faith effort to redirect what looked like a duplicate draft to the existing article has hidden useful draft content. I will be undoing the redirect so that the draft can be discussed and compared against the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)