Jump to content

Talk:Air Lituanica

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Number of destinations

[edit]

So far, I've reverted two edits made by 92.20.XX.XXX ([1], [2]) regarding the number of destinations the airline flies to. Can you, the author of these reverted edits, discuss here why the airline flies to a single destination? Given that you can take a plane from Vilnius to Brussels or from Brussels to Vilnius, the number of destinations is clearly two.--Jetstreamer Talk 21:52, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Number of destinations (again)

[edit]

Apart from the above, I've reverted also two edits made by an anonymous editor having 2.9X.XXX.XXX as IP address ([3], [4]). With the addition of Amsterdam, the number of destinations has increased to three: Amsterdam, Brussels and Vilnius. Is it so difficult to discuss the changes here?--Jetstreamer Talk 22:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With table of destinations put this way, it's more reasonable to say that the airline serves two destinations, not three. Sorry for reverting.--Jetstreamer Talk 11:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Latest unexplained/unsourced changes

[edit]

This is the last set of edits, made by 78.56.143.41 (talk · contribs), that was reverted. It was unexplained, as there are sources in the article stating that Amsterdam would be served at least until 4 December, plus there were an unexplained removal of sourced content. Similar edits were previously made by 78.63.210.62 (talk · contribs). All my recent reversions ([5], [6], [7]) dealt with the same issue, and were done with a companion warning template placed at the corresponding IP's talk page. I got no answers there. The IPs that made the above edits has yet another chance here to explain their rationale. A request for protection is still pending. --Jetstreamer Talk 23:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The first IP stroke again with unsourced changes. I've reverted them twice ([8], [9]). Page protection will be requested next time. These edits are a blatant violation of WP:VERIFY, as the IP has been told several times at their talk page.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archived references not used in the article

[edit]

--Jetstreamer Talk 15:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]