Jump to content

Talk:Albian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mistake in the Theropod section

[edit]

Under theropods, the genus "Xenoposeidon" is listed. Though the material and classification is still up in the air, it is still officially grouped in the order Sauropoda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.141.115 (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That, and the small detail that it's from the Berriasian-Hauterivian, not the Albian. J. Spencer (talk) 03:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Faulty Content

[edit]

There's content in the section titled "Ammonites" that identifies "Hoplites" as an Albian fossil. The associated link is to an article on the Greek heavy infantry c. 7th century BCE called Hoplites. I'm not knowledgeable enough to decide whether the reference to an ammonite called "Hoplites" is incorrect or the link is incorrect.

68.214.235.69 (talk) 19:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Faulty Content

[edit]

There's also a fossil listed under "Ammonites" as "Lechites," but the link is to an article on tribes of West Slavs called Lechites. Once again, I'm not knowledgeable enough to decide whether the listing or the link is in error

Mike 68.214.235.69 (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem in both cases is with the link. They're both real ammonites. :) Abyssal leviathin (talk) 20:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete

[edit]

Alot of the collumns for each species is left blank. Also on the Carcharodontosaurus page it says that it is from the albian and links to this page. Yet Carcharodontosaurus isnt listed in the tables 0_0 I filled in the locations of some of the Species from what i know. Like Suchomimus, Spinosaurus, Sarchosuchus and aegyptosaurus are fro africa. Spinodontosaurus (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gobisaurus1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Gobisaurus1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:09, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Albian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]