Jump to content

Talk:Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 21, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 31, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the PlayStation Portable video game Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem had a shorter development cycle than the film it was based on?

Merger proposal

[edit]

There is a merger tag on the article page. Since I've significantly expanded the article, I no longer feel a merger is required or justified. I'll be removing the tag in a few days unless someone has an objection. — Levi van Tine (tc) 13:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I've removed the tag. Fantastic job expanding the article, especially adding all those references! --IllaZilla (talk) 18:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of image under development

[edit]

That image that is referred to as "concept art" for Aliens Vs Predator: Requem for PSP is in fact is nothing of the sort - it is merely the cover of a novel "Aliens vs. Predator: Prey", released in 1994. That particular cover art for that version of book was released in 1997, by Dimitri Patelis. It has nothing to do with this game besides the title.

Here is a source on Patelis' website. [1]

I suggest it should be removed from this article, as it has nothing to do with the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.145.137 (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I was wondering where that came from. I'll remove it. --IllaZilla (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Is it reasonably well written?

A. Prose quality: Well written

B. MoS compliance: Complies

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

A. References to sources: Yes

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Yes

C. No original research: No original research

Is it broad in its coverage?

A. Major aspects: Covered

B. Focused: Yes

Is it neutral?

Fair representation without bias: Yes

Is it stable? Yes

No edit wars, etc: None recently

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: Yes

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Yes

Overall: Pass or Fail: Pass bridies (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]