Talk:All in the Mind (BBC radio)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the All in the Mind (BBC radio) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Untitled

I would have thought that this article could have done with much more coverage of the programme, including some of the topics that have been covered on the most recent series (2008 at the time of typing this). ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now corrected the spelling of Kaptchuk - this can be found on the website of BBC Radio Four, at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qxx9

ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since the programme is a psychology programme, just let me know if you think that the bit about life expectancy in Hong Kong is off-subject. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:41, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting a little concerned that since I am the only editor of this page, all of the changes to it seem to be nothing more than adding what happens in each week's edition. Let me know how it can be made more comprehensive. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

A big thank you to those who have structured the page bettter - it looks a better to have the specific months of programme broadcasts as sub-headings! ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for structure

If the archives of the programme are put up in the same way as the material is currently presented, it's going to get very long. I wonder whether there's merit in a table, one row per episode, with one table/section to a series. The Columns could be: Date of broadcast, topics covered, notable guests, notes (including links to online reserach material discussed.) How would that be? Fulleraaron (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

This article needs updating

Why does this aricle finish its discussion of the 2012 series with references to episodes broadcast in June 2012? There have been episodes broadcast in November 2012 - ergo, this article needs updating. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]