Talk:Alpha and Omega 2: A Howl-iday Adventure

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: Films

	Animation portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
	This redirect is supported by the Animated films work group.

Reception

An editor using a dynamic IP address seems to believe that "Alpha and Omega 2: A Howl-iday Adventure received mixed reviews from critics." The rest of the section contradicts this

Two sources are given in the section:

"so thin and uninteresting, and so lacking in holiday spirit, that you're not going to be pulling this one out each year when the holidays roll around" and that the movie's price combined with its film length made other film choices "even more attractive."
1 out of 5 stars and wrote that the "Faux holiday-themed sequel is weak and forgettable."

That is entirely negative. Calling this "mixed" is WP:POV and wrong at the same time.

As the editor in question has made this claim repeatedly under various IPs, ignoring talk requests/edit summaries and making similarly unsourced POV statements in other articles, we might need edit protection and/or a range block on the IPs involved. - SummerPhD (talk) 01:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]