Talk:Amateur Station Operator's Certificate/GA2

GA Review

Intro

Hey there! I'm weebiloobil, and I'm here to assess your article. Having noticed that you've had a previous, recent GA Review, I may take some of the comments made there into consideration. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Or if you fancy a chat. Good luck! - weebiloobil (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Review

This is usually the bit where I go rabbiting on about how you have 7 days to improve the article, you need to do this and that, this image needs fixing, etc. However, this article - and I can't remember the last time this happened to me - has passes without any need to go on hold. The only issue I found was a double full stop, which I corrected myself. Other than that, the article is great, definitely GA status. Well done! - weebiloobil (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I guess it must because I do not believe in GA, preferring to go straight for FAs. I was aiming for a Featured Topic and I still need to research to get this to FA status. I've never got a GA, so thought why not try get at least one? =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the spirit! - weebiloobil (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) My FA:GA ratio is now 17:1. What need to be mentioned is that I copy-pasted parts of the featured article Amateur radio in India to fill in some content here. =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does nee matter. Good luck with more FAs - weebiloobil (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]