Talk:Ambiophonics

Professional sound production Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nofootnotes tag and cleanup

Regarding the nofootnotes tag, I noticed the list of references at the bottom, but they need to be properly cited within the article itself. See WP:CIT for the appropriate templates to use. For cleanup, I think there's too much technical jargon in this article. It seems like the intended audience for this article is too specific. Sjsharktank (talk) 09:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody had cited the references inline, but in a non-standard way. I wikified these. Note that the last reference was not cited inline, so I simply left in at the bottom of the References section. That needs to be tidied up. I also converted three inline external links to <ref>s. These need to be changed from bare URLs; {{cite web}} would be good for this. HairyWombat 18:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ad copy

This reads like ad copy. It should tell us how Ambiophonics works. Odradek5 (talk) 19:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proper noun

Is "ambiophonics" a proper noun? This article is inconsistent on whether it is capitalized when not at the beginning of a sentence. — voidxor 00:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]