Jump to content

Talk:Andreas Vogt/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheBritinator (talk · contribs) 15:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 00:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Will review soon. IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. See prose section below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Just based on first glance the lead could definitely be longer. Based on the size of the rest of the article one good sized paragraph should be good. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. See broadness section below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.
There's this one but I do not know when it is from. I'm like 98% sure it is PD-Liechtenstein-Unknown, however if it from after 1954 then it wouldn't be. I just decided not to risk an albeit very small chance of a copyright violation. I could upload it anyway if there is a reasonable good faith argument for it. TheBritinator (talk) 08:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

Broadness

[edit]