Jump to content

Talk:Andy Slaughter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photo

[edit]

This page could do with a Photo Matthewfelgate 22:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blair mention

[edit]

I'm sure prime minsters have campaigned in by elections. Shouldnt this read this localities' by election

PS photo would be nice SuzanneKn 16:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Most recent change re: 42 days detention ... I'm not sure this is the place for people to grind party political axes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.203.72.97 (talk) 21:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for Hammersmith: Shaun Bailey, Andy Slaughter and the great Wikipedia mystery

[edit]

It appears that a Shaun Bailey shill has been editing this page for propaganda purposes. --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Post Office Closures and Encyclopedia content.

[edit]

Firstly its my intention to provide unbiased material for an encyclopedia, not election material. Please note, my edit relating to PPS was absolutely correct -please see the article, to quote, "PPSs are expected to act as part of the payroll vote, voting in line with the government on every division" If this wasn't the case you would have to provide a citation for Slaughter's claim which you haven't done. I therefore going revert the edit. You may also want to look at Wikipedia:NPOV, Wikipedia:No original research,Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:NOT

JRPG (talk) 14:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PPS do not have vote with the government. Five PPS voted against the Atlee's government in May 1949 on an Irish devolution bill. More recently PPCs voted against the Iraq invasion and as Mr David Kidney MP affirms it is uncommon but not unpresidented for PPCs to vote against the government http://www.davidkidney.com/pps-?Init=f208e4c3-48ae-adc4-5997-f1f881b79515 -- this edit should therefore be reinstated.

R2997790 (talk) 15:52, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Firstly thanks for the curteous reply. We both want to get the article factually correct and fair as quickly as possible.
Are you saying the article on PPS Q.V. is incorrect?
PPSs are expected to act as part of the payroll vote, voting in line with the government on every division, and regarded as members of the government for purposes of collective responsibility.[1]
I'm willing to change the PPS article to show the exceptions if you can find a good reference for the 1949 vote. I can then change this article to say that it is with very few exceptions, a resignation matter. It won't take long. Is that OK?
BTW isn't a PPC a prospective parliamentary candidate? JRPG (talk) 18:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ The Ministerial Code §2.9

Requested move

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was: Page Moved. Station1 (talk) 07:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Andrew SlaughterAndy Slaughter — Andy Slaughter is known by that name, not Andrew Slaughter. He was registered as a candidate in the 2010 and 2005 General Elections as Andy Slaughter. Furthermore, he is widely known as Andy Slaughter in Hammersmith constituency and in the media.Imran1978 (talk) 12:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - while not necessarily the most common usage, Andy is commonly used: Guardian, Telegraph, and various other press sources, but most tellingly parliament.uk and his own Twitter feed use that form. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Change of name and TWFY.com

[edit]

According to an email I've received from Matthew Somerville of TWFY.com, he was given in Hansard as Andrew up to mid March 2007, and then switched to Andy. TheyWorkForYou has now been updated JRPG (talk) 13:03, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andy Slaughter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andy Slaughter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]