Jump to content

Talk:Antje Duvekot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pronunciation

[edit]

How does she say her name? -MrFizyx 20:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to her booking agency, it's "AN-tyuh DOO-va-kot". --Allen 03:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antje Duvekot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article has confused, garbled information. "at the age of" in bio is not followed by an age. Also, the article claims she was born in 1974 but other outside sources say 1976. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CF:407F:740:8065:6DFE:1760:A1D4 (talk) 19:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (July 2021)

[edit]

I'm not 100% sure this is the most specific tag. But. The article is *fairly* clearly written from someone closely related. The entire discog is unsourced (not unusual), the entire article is full of minutiae that aren't encyclopedically relevant, and it's written like a personal website, in fact some of it is borderline pasted from the personal website. It's not enough that I'd be comfortable calling it a copyvio though. -- a lad insane (channel two) 11:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]