Talk:Araucaria araucana

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Chile High‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Description

This is mentioned: "The female (seed) cones, which mature in autumn about 18 months after pollination". However, I passed one this afternoon, 20-5-2017, in a yard in the Netherlands, that has them fully developed. Hardly autumn, I would say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.30.85.137 (talk) 18:03, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey Puzzle?

Why exactly would a monkey have trouble climbing the tree? Because the old ones have so few branches or the young ones have branches/leaves that make it difficult? Monkeys (as opposed to apes) can do some amazing gymnastics. I'm guessing a lot of people hit this page to find out what the "monkey puzzle" is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.227.247.82 (talk) 13:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is largely Original Research (or speculation) but considering the term originated in England where the vast majority of monkey puzzle trees are young and relatively small, often with branches right down to the ground, I'd guess the term originates from a perception that the leaves would be uncomfortable or even painful to grip. Since almost all of the plant is covered by the leaves there would be nowhere 'safe' for a monkey to place it's hands and feet so climbing one would require a lot of care and careful planning. However whilst I've never seen a monkey climb a monkey puzzle tree I have seen them climb cacti and other sharp/spikey plants extremely quickly so I assume this term has no basis in fact. 82.68.159.246 (talk) 17:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If I may offer more Original Research, these trees are in gardens in the San Francisco Bay area, and I suspect that many of them are more than 100 years old. The pictures included with the article, although excellent, do not do justice to the way the branches of a mature tree intertwine and change direction, although some of the pictures hint at it. While the usual large tree looks like a sort of 3-dimensional maze close up,the trees shown are more or less ordinary in their general form because they are seen from a distance. Trimming the tree makes it worse. A branch may "get the idea" to wrap itself around to the other side of the tree, or shoot upwards and back toward the trunk, or assume a sort of corkscrew shape. The general tendency is to droop a bit and then grow upward, as you can see from the pictures. And as noted above, the tree is practically impossible to climb without protective clothing, although monkeys, with their hands and feet hardened by never wearing gloves of shoes, would presumably be able to manage it. 173.174.85.204 (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)Eric[reply]

Tallest

Is there any plant specialist out there who know where the biggest one in Northern Hemisphere is?? --Slimliving4god 21:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tallest in the UK is 31 m tall (Tree Register of the British Isles). - MPF 13:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iceland

I'm moving the enclosed from the article to here:

Perhaps the south of Iceland would be very suitable for the introduction of this tree, given that this area has a very similar climate than the coast of Norway, but it has not been planted there.

Something along these lines might be appropriate but only if WP:ATT and encylopedic tone can be improved. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants#Original research in several articles for more discussion. Kingdon 18:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portland Oregon has number of these trees spread throughout the city, planted in the early 1900's. They're around the 20-25 meter range.--71.222.54.25 01:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Media references

The Ghost and Mrs. Muir makes mention of this tree. 24.205.209.106 (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some new images

I recently uploaded some new photos I took of an Araucaria araucana, below. I realise there are already many images of this tree, but feel free to use if useful. Dcoetzee 19:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey puzzle tree related to the "Jet" stone found in British coast

Apparently, the Jet mined for centuries was formed when ancient Monkey puzzle trees where compressed ove millions of years.....

File:P.N.Nahuelbuta2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:P.N.Nahuelbuta2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 14 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monkey Puzzle Tree in snow at Kew.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Monkey Puzzle Tree in snow at Kew.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Monkey Puzzle Tree in snow at Kew.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Araucaria araucana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diameter

The lead says:

an evergreen tree growing to 1–1.5 m (3–5 ft) in diameter

This is clearly contradicted by the first image in the article, file:Araucaria_en_Parque_Nacional_Conguillio.jpg Not sure what would be correct. Nø (talk) 13:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure there's a contradiction (?) It's kind of difficult to judge in that picture, but to me it looks as though the diameter of the tree *could* be about 1.5m. Assuming the two people in the picture are standing beside the tree, it looks to be about as broad as their two bodies side by side. L T T H U (talk) 13:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - I read it as the diameter of the crown; clearly you read it as it was intended as the diameter of the trunk. I'll just rephrase, then:

an evergreen tree growing to a trunk diameter of 1–1.5 m (3–5 ft)

Wiki Education assignment: Applied Plant Ecology Winter 2024

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 20 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Artemis1414, Tiliqua gigas gigas (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Warmedforbs (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]