Talk:Arlandria (song)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Arlandria is the third single
[edit]This news website clearly states that Arlandria is the third single off the album: [1]. Both Rope and Walk were singles in the UK before, and charted as such, see link: [2] QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- But if you consider the single release instead of radio charts, "Arlandria" was released after "Rope", because "Walk" was released only in Germany as a digital single only (on radio charts, "Walk" was charted after "Rope", but it doesn't mean that it is a single also in the UK). In my country (I live in Italy), five songs have radio airplay: "Rope", "Walk", "These Days" and "Back and Forth". --SuperVirtual (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is complete nonsense. Firstly the song is available to download commercially in any country, therefore it is released worldwide. I think the said user maybe indicating that it is only available in the UK with the artwork ? Even if this is the case that does not mean the song is not available commercially elsewhere. The iTunes source he is quoting does not even say that the single was only released in the UK. ::Just quoting the iTunes page would be in breach of Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position. These news sources specifically say that the song is the third single:[3] and [4].QuintusPetillius (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- But iTunes determs the releases of the digital singles! Is not nosense. --SuperVirtual (talk) 13:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Right iTunes is not the authority on digital single releases, they are merely another company who sells them. The iTunes source you are quoting does not specifically support the information you are putting into the article, therefore your edits are in breach of Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position. I have already provided two sources above which both say that it is the third single. I shall continue to revert your edits upon these grounds.QuintusPetillius (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Original research means when a user writes personal information without adding sources. I added a source for this. --SuperVirtual (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- No, the link I have added Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position, is about how you should not add information that is not directly supported by the source. The source you are citing from iTunes does not specifically state the information that you are adding into the article. For example it does not specifically state that Arlandria was the second single, you are just adding a link to its page on the UK iTunes page, this is Synthesis of published material that advances a position. I will continue to revert on these grounds.QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:01, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Original research means when a user writes personal information without adding sources. I added a source for this. --SuperVirtual (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Right iTunes is not the authority on digital single releases, they are merely another company who sells them. The iTunes source you are quoting does not specifically support the information you are putting into the article, therefore your edits are in breach of Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position. I have already provided two sources above which both say that it is the third single. I shall continue to revert your edits upon these grounds.QuintusPetillius (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- But iTunes determs the releases of the digital singles! Is not nosense. --SuperVirtual (talk) 13:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)