Talk:Articulatory phonology

Linguistics: Phonetics / Applied Linguistics Mid‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Mücke, D.; Hermes, A.; Tilsen, S. (2020). "Incongruencies between phonological theory and phonetic measurement". Phonology. 37 (1): 133–170. doi:10.1017/S0952675720000068.

Comment: Contact Wugapodes if you would like access to these sources in order to improve the article.

Plagiarism

The third paragraph was copied/pasted from the abstract of the following paper: [1]. I'll correct that soon, but if anyone wants to do it in the meantime, feel free. :) Lingeek (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Better late than never... — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 06:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've revision deleted the infringing revisions per WP:RD1. — Wug·a·po·des 19:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

This page would benefit from

a comprehensive description of gestures as pre-linguistic action units
task-dynamics
the relationship between AP and task-dynamics (task-dynamics is a theory/model about motor control whereas AP is essentially a hypotheses in the task-dynamic framework that linguistic primitives are action units)
pi-gestures
the coupled oscillator model (and specifically its use in AP)
dynamics/dynamical systems
equation(s) of motion and critically damped oscillators
research methods (e.g., EMA, X-Ray microbeam, rtMRI, ultrasound, region of interest analysis, segmentations, analysis by synthesis in TADA)
a comparison between this system and SPE-originating phonology
and descriptions for what counts as valid/informative in Articulatory Phonology (i.e., time to peak velocity is considered a useful measurement for comparing gesture stiffness, and inter-gestural timing indicates gestural coupling patterns, both of which are hypotheses about action/language cognition; on the other hand, symbolic transcriptions of speech are not considered valuable information wrt the AP hypothesis because they don't represent movement, and acoustic measurements are less informative than articulatory measurements except when a phonological target is hypothesized to be an acoustic one)
citation to the Saltzman & Munhall 1989 paper, which is a vital citation for task-dynamics

I'll try to get back to this whenever I'm not dissertating. Beatboxscientist (talk) 23:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]