Talk:Ashur-nadin-ahhe II
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The name Ashur-nadin-apli is mentioned as a proposed alternative for Ashur-nadin-ahhe II (or I) but the only king I see on the king list that bears that name lived after Assur-uballit I. (There is an Assur-uballit II but that is the very last king much much later.)
Is there an earlier Ashur-nadin-apli missing or what?? nl:Sokpopje 152.1.193.141 23:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Without dealing with the matter in detail about this little-known king, the question is whether ahhe is the correct reading of the cuneiform sign in the text EA 16, or if it could be read as apli. This is the only remark in the written sources about this diplomatic marriage. --JFK 14:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Low-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Assyrian articles
- High-importance Assyrian articles
- WikiProject Assyria articles
- Stub-Class Iraq articles
- Unknown-importance Iraq articles
- WikiProject Iraq articles
- Stub-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Unknown-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment