Talk:Avrom Lasarow

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 30 September 2012 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Lasarowa (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

This manner of referencing is perfectly acceptable.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Avrom Lasarow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleanup

Although there is no doubt about this person's notability it appears he is notable for many of the wrong reasons. There is plenty of press surrounding this individual which appears to have been left out of this article in favour less reliable sources that speak more favourably, perhaps in an attempt to push the negative publicity furthur down the google rankings? I have tried to fix most of the self aggrandising waffle and replace it with something more accurate and balanced, but I appreciate that there is a lot of work to do on this page before it even remotely resembles and encyclopaedia article. I am going to wait for suggestions and other contributions before removing the maintenance tags. Cr@Z Kit-Kat Lover^t@lk 16:13, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Surreptitious edit

It appears the page may have been edited by someone closely connected to the subject. Much of the criticism and unflattering press has been removed and the page is no longer balanced, nor does it cover the full ontology of the subject. I am inclined to roll back these surreptitious edits but am conscious that this is a living person who weilds a great deal of political and financial clout so we must be careful how we proceed. Does anyone have any suggestions for fixing the page? Cr@Z Kit-Kat Lover^t@lk 11:10, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]