Talk:b2evolution

Proposed delete

• Strongly oppose. Have a look at the criteria, of course b2evolution has been the subject of "multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." Greenman 15:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry, it was me that overlooked this page and inserted the prod template. I can't see any mention of any non-trivial published works in the article, nor are there any references. CiaranG 21:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Added one external article on this software. Greenman 17:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strongly oppose. Why? Jake b 21:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• The deletion discussion was started after someone vandalized the page with a deletion-notice. So it's not up for discussion at all. Strangnet 09:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Advertisement?

This page has no references and pretty much seems like an advertising article. I could be wrong, just from my POV it seems "ad like" Teamcoltra (talk) 04:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC) (fixed thought I was logged in)

I don't think this page is "ad like" but I have a concern with the last link "Example of a UK based web hosting company offering B2evolution for free" which doesn't refer to b2evolution at all. I propose to delete this link. Antoine1970 (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Agree, I've removed it. Greenman (talk) 01:14, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Possible grammar issue

Being French I'm no specialist (hence the talk page entry), but this sentence seems strangely constructed to me. Could a competent English-speaker check it?

Whilst there are a few exceptions; most of the major new releases are named after famous cities or particular places [4] the project maintainer has been and/or inspired from.

Thanks for picking up, fixed. I've also changed it to the past tense as the naming convention no longer seems to be applicable, Greenman (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)